Difference Between Travis and Jenkins
The following article provides an outline for Travis vs Jenkins. For projects that require testing in multiple environments at one time, Travis continuous integration is used. While Jenkins can also do the same task but it is more suitable for larger projects where modification is required at a higher level. Jenkins is a continuous integration tool completely based on Java programming language. It’s open-source software that has a lot of features that can be implemented in projects using available plugins. Travis is also open-source software that comes with free hosting so that coders don’t have to create or provide their own servers for projects, unlike Jenkins. Travis continuous integration makes testing easy and fast at no cost at all. As you can purchase plans depending upon your requirements.
Head to Head Comparison Between Travis and Jenkins (Infographics)
Below are the top 9 differences between Travis vs Jenkins
Key Differences Between Travis Continuous Integration and Jenkins
Let us discuss some of the key differences:
- Travis CI comes with a completely free cloud-based hosting as you don’t have to provide your own dedicated server whereas in Jenkins it is not cloud-based because it is hosted internally which requires maintenance and configuration on an updated basis. An admin is required in Jenkins for handling a project.
- Through Travis CI you can run a test on Linux and Mac OSX simultaneously it also supports programming languages like C, C++, Clojure, Crystal, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, etc. whereas in Jenkins you can easily run, build, test and deploy it over different operating systems like Windows, Linux and Mac OSX.
- Travis CI is easy to set up and install because it’s lightweight and allows integration with other continuous integration tools through job scheduling whereas in Jenkins it’s quite difficult to configure as the installation is easy. It has plugins varieties for continuous integration with different project models.
- In Jenkins, you can’t build a project if some error occurs in a particular stage in the pipeline as it will fail the build whereas in Travis CI you can easily launch build with various conditions.
- Travis CI is compatible with Kubernetes, Docker, and several other programs whereas Jenkins is also compatible with Kubernetes, Docker, Libvirt, and other programs.
- Jenkins is used to monitoring external jobs over distributed builds by customizing Jenkins environment through vast varieties of plugins whereas Travis CI is used to deploy over multiple cloud services by integrating automatically with GitHub and building pull requests for repository access.
- Travis CI provides services like queuing messages and notification and database operations in projects through the help of plugins whereas Jenkins supports various job models like pipeline, freestyle, etc. where you can schedule a job for the future without facing any difficulty.
- Every time a build is triggered the system will create a virtual machine in Travis continuous integration you need to buy a premium plan if you want CI for commercial projects whereas in Jenkins every integration will be done on the server through admin.
- One of the biggest benefits of Jenkin’s continuous integration is customization with functionalities like alerts, authentication, job scheduling and credentials whereas in Travis’s continuous integration biggest benefit is integration with the cloud with full functionality which we can run them in parallel.
Travis Continuous Integration vs Jenkins Comparison Table
Let’s discuss the top comparison between Travis Continuous Integration vs Jenkins:
| Factors | Travis CI | Jenkins |
| Cost | Free open-source server for developers as you can use as many servers you want without spending any money. For private projects, you have to buy premium plans. | Free open-source server but have to run our own dedicated server that might cost developers depending upon the number of servers being implemented in the project |
| Configuration | Travis is easy to install and configure as compare to Jenkins. All you have to do is create a configuration file and start integrating your project based on requirements. | Jenkins is quite different for Travis because the configuration is very specific as you might have to provide an exact version of plugins based on project requirements and it is not easy as Travis. |
| Performance | Performance of Travis Continuous Integration is up to mark always as you can’t compare it with Jenkins because both have different performances based on project preferences. | The performance of Jenkins is up to mark always as you can’t compare it with Travis Continuous Integration because both have different performances based on project preferences. |
| Customizability | For limited customizability in your project, Travis Continuous Integration is the best choice because you don’t have to invest extra time in the configuration. Both have different performance based on customization. | For unlimited customizability in your project, Jenkins is the best choice if you invest some extra time in the configuration. But once it’s done your performance will be better. |
| Hosting | Travis continuous integration is better in case of hosting because as well know hosting is free in Travis Continuous Integration and it requires minimal configuration. | Jenkins is not better as Travis in case of hosting because as well know hosting is internal in Jenkins and it requires more configuration. |
| Github | If you want to use Github in your project then Travis Continuous Integration is the best tool for you. Easy to implement and use as compare to Jenkins. | If you want to use Github in your project then Jenkins is not the best tool for you as you can face issues is version is different in configuration and you have other versions installed. |
| Support | In terms of support, Travis Continuous Integration has limited support from the community. | In terms of support Jenkins has extensive support from the community. |
| System Control | Travis CI has very less control over systems. | Jenkins has full end to end over control systems. |
| Server Machine | Travis continuous integration is cloud-based, not server-based. | Jenkins is completely serve based not cloud-based. |
Conclusion
Both Travis continuous integration and Jenkins play an important role in the integration of projects at a smaller and bigger level but who will perform better is directly proportional to the requirement of the project and its preferences. For small open-source Travis CI is the best and for larger enterprise projects Jenkins is the best.
Recommended Articles
This has been a guide to Travis vs Jenkins. Here we also discuss the key differences with infographics and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
