Updated June 22, 2023
Difference Between Jenkins vs Bamboo
Bamboo is a CI/CD server from Atlassian. Developers can use Bamboo to automate the process of building, integrating, and preparing the app for deployment. Bamboo works closely with Atlassian’s alternative tools like Jira (project management) and Hipchat (team communication). Jenkins is the most well-liked open supply CI/CD tool on the market today. Jenkins permits developers to automatically build, integrate, and take a look at the code as presently as they commit it to the supplied repository.
What is Bamboo?
Bamboo is powerful if you exploit it with Bitbucket and JIRA and are willing to get your CI answer. Also, Bamboo is straightforward to use, and users will add multiple tasks in less time. Developers who wish for more accessible preparation capability and are willing to use clear UI ought to provide it with an attempt. Choose the simplest primarily based on your needs.
Simple and intuitive drag & drop UI for planning Pipelines, supported constant tasks, jobs, and stages principles of Continuous Delivery. Fanning out/in is trivial.
- Temporarily disabling Stages, Jobs, or Tasks is trivial. Jobs will be dropped between Stages, Stages, and Tasks to re-order, with pop-up warnings if what you’re on the brink of doing doesn’t be.
- Chaining pipelines along, which is not as slick as GoCD, is also possible; but I’ll pronto admit that this is often one of Bamboo’s weakest points.
- A separate preparation manager, within which you’ll manage preparation environments, track what you have discharged and wherever, and full traceability from a unleash back to the rotter commits and, therefore, the JIRA problems it includes.
- Automatically detects new branches and builds them. It’s even doable (albeit via a cheap plugin) for a constant pipeline to behave otherwise on a branch build.
- Build Artifacts are automatically managed through every pipeline run and deployment; no one has to be compelled to stage artifacts in the associate external repository.
- As you’d expect, integration with alternative Atlassian products is superior to alternative combos you’ll concoct.
What is Jenkins?
Originally developed to be a build automation tool, it’s since evolved into a multi-faceted platform with over 1400 plugins for alternative software system tools. These plugins expand Jenkins into 5 areas: platforms, UI administration, ASCII text file management, and build management. This enables developers to catch bugs quickly and ultimately deploy abundant quicker.
- Popular open supply, straightforward to get plugins for. (for instance, there is a test swarm plugin for Jenkins, and I required to compose my very own explicit arrangement of manufacture scripts to try to do likewise in Bamboo in lightweight of the very fact that a plugin did not exist)
- Easy to get different purchasers and find assistance on Jenkins.
- Free and straightforward to set up
- Does not do programmed stretching/combining
Head To Head Comparison Between Jenkins and Bamboo (Infographics)
Below is the top 7 difference between Jenkins vs Bamboo
Key differences between Jenkins and Bamboo
Both are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the significant differences:
- Jenkins is an associate open-supply project supported by developers around the world. Whereas Bamboo is an industrial tool developed and maintained by their parent businesses
- Bamboo is comparable in its simple use; however, the UI isn’t quite as pretty. Jenkins falls wanting Bamboo during this class. Jenkins’ UI may be a small additional old school; however, the new Blue Ocean interface was a serious upgrade.
- Bamboo has fewer options out of the box; however, it integrates natively with Atlassian’s tool stack’s remainder. This makes Bamboo feel additional feature-wealthy while not possessing the choices themselves. Jenkins is the most feature-sparse tool of the 3; however, it makes up for a huge plugin scheme.
- Jenkins encompasses an extensive scheme of plugins, giving it unprecedented customization and extensibility. Bamboo is growing its ecosystems slowly; however, it will most likely never catch up at this rate.
- As an associate open supply project, Jenkins encompasses a massive, helpful community of contributors that offer support to 1 another. As such, Jenkins has intensive documentation; however, you are left to comb through the docs yourself to find out or solve a retardant. On the other hand, Bamboo provides skilled support from their parent businesses, which are still growing user communities. Bamboo users can notice a pleasant mixture of active support from a company still as crowd-sourced support from the community.
- Many small-to-medium-size software system groups run solely on cloud infrastructure. Thus, it was difficult for some Bamboo users once Atlassian discontinued the Bamboo cloud, forcing groups to run it on-premise. They replaced the service with BitBucket Pipelines; however, several feel it is not an ideal replacement. Jenkins continues to be out there to run on cloud servers.
- As an open supply software system, Jenkins is unengaged to use, despite your scale. Bamboo is the costliest of the tools. It starts at $10 but offers an incredibly restricted expertise for this worth. You will have to license Bamboo for the entire expertise for a one-time price of $880 for one remote agent.
Jenkins vs Bamboo Comparison Table
The primary comparison is discussed below:
|The basis of comparison||
|Open Source||Jenkin is open-source||Bamboo is not open source|
|Pricing Logic||Jenkin is free||It charges for the number of build agents required|
|Built With||Java programming language||Java programming language|
|Operating System||Windows, Ubuntu, Red Hat, Mac OS||Windows, Linux, Solaris|
|Browsers||Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer||Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Edge|
|Plugin Support||Yes, It supports a lot of plugins||It does not support many plugins as compared to Jenkins|
|Support||Being open-source, it has a lot of support from communities||It has not much support as compared to Jenkins|
The winner of this throwdown may be a toss-up. To settle on the correct CI/CD tool, you must consider your budget, internal resources, and the quantity of time you wish to pay for learning and setup. If you have a DIY angle and need the most practicality, then Jenkins may be your tool. If you favor better user expertise and a tool that integrates with your existing school stack, look at Bamboo.
Remember that your CI/CD tool is simply one of the tools you will need to win the race of software system development. Preparation and application observance are equally necessary components of agile development. Never accept the method you have; keep exploring tactics to upgrade your techniques and practices.
This has been a guide to the top differences between Jenkins and Bamboo. Here we also discuss the Jenkins vs Bamboo key differences with infographics and a comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –