Difference Between Redux vs Flux
The applicability and importance of today’s title (mean Redux vs Flux) can be better understood if SCOPE (first thing first) is discussed. SCOPE generally means your deliverables in terms of quality, efficiency and overall functionality to deliver a project in a best possible way within the deadline. With such critical pre-requisites choosing a right technique is very crucial and can become a reason for project success or failure. Let’s go around with some statistics about IT projects. A research on IT projects states that around 68% of them gets flop out of which 41% contribute to poor planning and software’s. Moving forward to the title of the article Redux vs Flux let’s take one more example from the real world, if you are building something, a framework is a deciding factor and one of very initial for which you are bound to bother. The above discussion is also applicable to application development – where the right framework and right pattern makes your job easy and efficiently. So let’s see some definitions which will be used quite often in this Redux vs Flux article.
An Architectural Style is the application design at the highest level of abstraction.
An Architectural Pattern is a way of implementing an Architectural Style.
A Design Pattern is a way to solve a localized problem.
Redux, empowers its users to write applications that can work in a different environment (no matter the client, server or native), consistent behavior and east testing. Apart from these, it gives an amazing development experience such as live editing of code with time traveling debugger.
Flux application architecture is used by Facebook for creating client-side web based applications. It complements React’s composable view with a unidirectional data flow. It’s more of a patter kind than of a framework.
Both Flux vs Redux are used for making User Interface – framework and pattern (like we discussed in the Intro).
Head To Head Comparison Between Redux vs Flux
Below is the top 10 difference between Redux vs Flux
Key Difference Between Redux vs Flux
Some key differences are explained below between Redux vs Flux
- One of the major differences between Flux vs Redux is that REDUX lacks the Dispatcher.
- Code reloading from stores without clearing the state. In Flux, there are two things that the store contains. These are “state change logic” and the “current state itself”. So if this two Flux vs Redux things is there on the same object there will be a problem while hot reloading aka hot module reloading. (Note – Hot reloading means: After one develops an app using modules then the hot part of reloading can replace your module without changing the state of the application. This is good to have featured as the app never reloads it just exchange right JS on save). Back to code reloading, on storing the object one can lose the state that store is holding. Solution to this is there in REDUX where these two functions have been separated. Here one object holds the state and the other contains all the state change logic.
- A state is being re-written with every action –To several actions being performed at the time of debugging, the state is changed and this new state must be added to previous state objects. In FLUX what happens and how REDUX solves this kindly refer to the below diagram.
- Data applicability on a received action – in Flux, the logic of performing what to do on the data based on a received action is already written in the store( store is a kind of player in every Flux applications). The architecture of Flux applications also gives the flexibility to choose what and how many parts of the data is exposed publicly. In Redux, this logic remains in the reducer function which is called for every action. Here a store can’t be defined without a dedicated reducer function (reducer in Redux is a kind of simple function that returns a new state based on the previous state and action received).
- Simplicity – Redux in most cases preserves almost all the benefits of Flux either it is in terms of recording or replaying the actions, data flow, mutations dependency) and adding new benefits (undo-redo, hot reloading) with no interference from Dispatcher and store registration. One can easily understand the API configuration of Redux which is simple compared to Flux.
Redux vs Flux Comparison Table
The primary Comparison between Redux vs Flux are discussed below:
|The Basis Of Comparison Between Redux vs Flux||REDUX||FLUX|
|Developed||Dan Abramov and Andrew Clark||By facebook|
|Stable release||4.0.0(April 2017)||3.1.3(Nov 2016)|
|Initial release||June 2, 2015||the Year 2011|
|Store||Single store||Multiple stores|
|GitHub Stats||43.2K stars||15.5K stars|
|Integration||With React, jumpsuit, Meatier and react.js boilerplate||React, TuxedoJS and Fluxxor|
Conclusion – Redux vs Flux
FLUX users get simple application architecture. This is much easier to maintain the work and get moved as there are no ambiguities on the relationship between various components.
On top of that, Flux is consistent and more repeatable, a logical thing to work with from the development point of view. Creating an action is easier; the store manager for handling the actions is also easier.
Redux, having more developer base though it comes after Flux holds some key functionality that scores over Flux. Handling optimistic updates, rendering on the server, fetching data before performing route transmission, hot reload and undo-redo functionality male Redux more preferable.
Lastly coming back to the point where we have started it all depends upon the project requirement and the SCOPE. These initial planning and requirement phase decides the preferences as per the users need. Both Redux vs Flux have the potential to fulfill the need but Scope is all that defines the usability.
This has a been a guide to the top differences between Redux vs Flux. Here we also discuss the Redux vs Fluxe key differences with infographics, and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles –