Difference Between Jenkins and TeamCity
In formerly called Hudson, Jenkins is an automation server written in Java Programming Language and is open-source software. It facilitates the automation process of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery in the Software Development process. TeamCity is a build management tool and automation server that facilitates Continuous Integration. It provides limited features as freeware under some terms and conditions. It was based on server-based web application and support servlet based servers like Apache Tomcat etc. It supports different platforms such as Ruby, .NET, and Java.
Head To Head Comparison Between Jenkins and TeamCity (Infographics)
Below is the top 8 difference between Jenkins vs TeamCity
Key differences between Jenkins and TeamCity
Both are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major Difference Between Jenkins vs TeamCity:
- Jenkins’s open-source system is well documented and available on its open-source site, whereas TeamCity does not have well documentations provided over its site.
- Jenkins automation server system is not easier to set up and configure, whereas TeamCity is easier to use, configure and set up the installation and integrating with the version control systems.
- Jenkins can run build processes for multiple branches at a time in dynamic mode by providing running build status in a console for monitoring purposes, whereas TeamCity does not have this feature.
- Jenkins does not have the Individual validation feature, whereas TeamCity has an Individual validation feature.
- Jenkins does not have a port flexibility feature, whereas TeamCity has a port flexibility feature.
- Jenkins is widely used and has more users, whereas TeamCity is not widely used and has fewer users.
- Jenkins does not have a security feature, whereas TeamCity has a security feature by default.
- Jenkins has plugin features and is mostly plugin, whereas TeamCity has out-of-box features with excellent building process history.
- Jenkins has more extensibility and customization features, whereas TeamCity has no such feature to support integration.
- Jenkins provides an automatic build trigger system once a code check-in is done into the version control system by configuring in project settings in Jenkins settings feature, whereas TeamCity has no such plugin and configuration system to monitor the build process in console kind of application.
- Jenkins product update releases are quite frequent and great with some good feature updates and well documented, whereas TeamCity is also having frequent releases with good documentation that possesses less comprising support to the product.
- Jenkins provides API and extensibility, which supports the API in three different formats called JSON, XML and Python, whereas TeamCity does not provide any such information in its documentation.
- TeamCity vs Jenkins has large community-based users where the technical discussions or troubleshooting issues can be discussed and helped many users.
- Jenkins offers many free plug-ins and third-party integration features, whereas TeamCity also has plugin support developed by community users, which the TeamCity itself does not support, i.e., it is out of the scope.
- Jenkins has more learning curve in using the automation server for configuration, installation, and deployment, whereas TeamCity has less learning curve in terms of usage, configuring and installation.
- Jenkins has an Email notification and logging facility, whereas TeamCity also has the same features, but with different functionality and both TeamCity vs Jenkins products do not have inter-branch merge features.
- Jenkins does not have security by default and does not have a masking plugin that does not provide a masking password by default and provides 8080 as the default port, which conflicts with the application or web servers that have the same port, whereas TeamCity has default security feature a password masking.
- Jenkins was licensed under the MIT license. It supports the Java Standard Edition platform. It was initially released in the year 2011. It supports different operating systems such as Windows, UNIX like operating systems and Mac OS X.
- Jenkins supports different version control systems or repositories such as Github, Subversion, Mercurial, ClearCase, etc. TeamCity was developed and released by JetBrains.It was licensed under proprietary commercial software. It was written in Java Programming language. It was initially released in the year 2006.
Jenkins vs TeamCity Comparison Table
The primary comparison is discussed below:
|The basis of comparison||
|License||It was licensed under MIT license||It was licensed under a proprietary commercial license|
|Development||It was developed by Oracle (then Sun) initially and was later open-sourced.||It was developed by JetBrains software company.|
|It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Mercurial, AccuRev, ClearCase, RTC.||It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Mercurial, Perforce, IBM ClearCase, SourceGear Vault.|
|OS||It supports Windows, UNIX like operating systems and Mac OS X.||Concentrates completely on operating systems rather than a particular area|
|Open Source||It is free and Open Source||It is commercial and paid and has only a few features for free of cost.|
|Features||It has advanced features compared to TeamCity||It does not have advanced features|
|Security||It has less security compared to TeamCity||It has more security features compared to Jenkins|
|User base||It is widely used across different organizations||It is less used and has commercial features in it|
The Jenkins automation server is being used across most of the industry’s organisations because it is an open-source automation server system. It has advanced configuration features in it to provide great features for the users, and hence it has been the choice of most users. TeamCity being a commercial and paid one it is not being chosen by most of the companies in their projects to reduce project costs in the commercial point of view whereas, in the case of TeamCity, it has few advantages compared to the Jenkins like security features and few other paid features which will be considered by the organization where cost does not come into view.
The advantages of Jenkins are more compared to TeamCity as it has advanced features in terms of concurrent build processes and customization features in configuring the multiple repositories with the automation server. Jenkins is more preferable in terms of customizing and more features in the usage of the automation process. TeamCity is used in terms of fewer customization options required and more generic features for the security and stability related requirements.
This has been a guide to the top differences between Jenkins vs TeamCity. Here we also discuss the key differences with infographics and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
- Jenkins vs Bamboo – Useful Differences
- HTML5 vs XHTML – Which One Is Better
- Jenkins vs Travis CI – Top Comparisons
- Banana Pi vs Raspberry Pi
- Jenkins vs Hudson