Differences Between TypeScript vs Flow
Typescript supports the optional static typing feature which offers many advantages such as it provides the compiler a better code readability and understanding and the ones like better error detentions. All of this improves the documentation process using typescript significantly and gives a clear and a concise view.
Flow is known to be a simpler language than TypeScript due to it’s out of the box utility. A developer would have to learn TypeScript syntax e.g. Type Annotation and how to modify the code. They have to be very much sure about the type they are specifying and using. Flow, on the other hand, possesses the capability of auto-assignment of type information from existing code pieces by using “flow analysis” technique which picks up type errors on its own.
Head to Head Comparison Between TypeScript vs flow
Below is the top 8 comparison Between TypeScript vs flow
Key Differences Between TypeScript vs flow
Both TypeScript vs flow are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major Differences Between TypeScript vs flow:
- Typescript has better compatibility with many frameworks, libraries, and compilers as compared with Flow in many cases such as those like angularJs whereas if you are working on react.js, using flow should be the obvious choice. It is not that typescript is not supported by reacting, it’s just that due to the native unavailability, some additional tweaks and adjustment to your code are needed such as Typecasting.
- Typescript provides to you some additional language services such as code completion features, navigation and refactoring features whereas flow aims to build a deeper level of understanding of your code and is responsible for doing an interprocedural analysis.
TypeScript vs flow Comparison Table
Below are the lists of points, describe the comparisons Between TypeScript vs flow
|The basis of comparison Between Typescript vs Flow||TypeScript||Flow|
|Inception||Open Source and Free programming language developed at Microsoft||Not a programming language but is a flow-based typing tool|
|Which is to be used when||If you are working on Angular 2+ this becomes a better choice as it is the prevalent language in the angular community||If you are working on React, Flow becomes a better choice as it easily seems to integrate with babel and the already present infrastructure|
|Services||Along with the provision of static typing, it provides you with great language services and appropriate tooling which includes those like code refactoring, navigation, and auto-completion.||Along with the provision of static typing, flow provides to you a wide range of interprocedural analysis and develops an in-depth understanding of your code|
|Type||You have to be sure about the type that you specify||Your major focus lies on what to do rather than worrying about types|
Conclusion – TypeScript vs flow
Both Typescript vs Flow are amazing products in their own domain. Both Typescript vs Flow is helpful in making you write the correct code. There is no right and wrong in choosing the tool, so choose what your business demands and your project needs. I hope you must have liked TypeScript vs flow this post. Stay tuned to our blog for more posts like these.
4.8 (647 ratings)
This has a been a guide to the top differences between Typescript vs Flow. Here we also discuss the Typescript vs Flow key differences with infographics, and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles –