Difference Between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript
In this TypeScript vs CoffeeScript post, we will look into their differences in depth. Microsoft developed the typeScript in 2012, which is an open-source programming language. Client-side and server-side applications are developed using TypeScript. It is highly influenced by C#, Java, and JavaScript. Large applications are developed using TypeScript. It was developed to rectify the shortcomings of JavaScript.
CoffeeScript was developed in 2009 by Jeremy Ashkenas. CoffeeScript inspiration is from Ruby, Python, and Haskell. Initially, the compiler of CoffeeScript was in Ruby, but after two version releases, the language is changed to JavaScript. We can call this script as expression language as every function is an expression. The compiler is self-hosting.
Head to Head Comparison Between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript (Infographics)
Below are the top 38 differences between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript:
Key Differences Between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript
Let us discuss some of the major key differences between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript.
- When we call TypeScript as a superpower or superset to JavaScript, CoffeeScript can be said as a developed version or subset of JavaScript.
- The syntax of TypeScript takes many features from JS, while the syntax of CoffeeScript is mostly the same as JS.
- TypeScript is a strictly typed programming language, and CoffeeScript is a dynamically typed programming language.
- TypeScript supports the use of interfaces, while CoffeeScript does not support the usage of interfaces.
- Client-side and server-side applications can be run using TypeScript, while only server-side applications can be run using CoffeeScript.
- Very few browsers do not support TypeScript while CoffeeScript supports browsers based on their functionalities.
- Functions in TypeScript are a bit complex and are similar to JS. While in CoffeeScript, the function declaration has only one line of code.
- TypeScript does not have any features from Python and Ruby, but CoffeeScript has many features taken from both languages.
- Maven is used by many companies as a standard Java build tools, while Ant is not that common nowadays.
- TypeScript is among the top 10 languages, but CoffeeScript is not that popular.
- TypeScript is comparatively new when compared with CoffeeScript.
- TypeScript has proper integration with JS, while CoffeeScript does not interact well with JS.
TypeScript vs CoffeeScript Comparison Table
Let’s discuss the top comparison between TypeScript vs CoffeeScript:
| Sr no. | TypeScript | CoffeeScript |
|
1 |
Static type checking can be done easily in TypeScript. | Static type checking is not that easy in CoffeeScript. |
|
2 |
TypeScript has good support in Visual Studio. | CoffeeScript does not have much support in Visual Studio. |
|
3 |
TypeScript codes are not that concise as CoffeeScript. | CoffeeScript provides a cleaner and better code version. |
|
4 |
TypeScript is easy to learn for those who know JS. | CoffeeScript is good for those who know Ruby or Python. |
|
5 |
The syntax is similar to C or C++. | The syntax is not similar to C or C++. |
|
6 |
TypeScript has an Apache license. | CoffeeScript has an MIT license. |
|
7 |
TypeScript has .ts extension. | CoffeeScript has .coffee or .lit coffee extension. |
|
8 |
TypeScript is a high-level programming language. | CoffeeScript is a low level and light programming language. |
|
9 |
TypeScript is created and maintained by Microsoft. | CoffeeScript is maintained under the license by some developers. |
|
10 |
We can say that TypeScript is a modified version or super version of JS. | Though some features of JS are supported, CoffeeScript is not the super version of JS. |
|
11 |
Content is displayed through web browsers. | Content is displayed not through web browsers but through JavaScript Engine. |
|
12 |
TypeScript tries to upscale JS by providing new features. | CoffeeScript does not modify JS but takes the functionalities to modify its scripts. |
|
13 |
Scripts are not that complicated as Ant, and the project support is assured. | Scripts are complicated for long term projects, and the support will be less. |
|
14 |
Most of the databases are supported in TypeScript. | Only Mongo DB and RethinkDB are supported in CoffeeScript. |
|
15 |
Any database is supported in TypeScript. | Though CoffeeScript does not specify the support to the database, it works well with Mongo DB. |
|
16 |
TypeScript has multilingual support. | CoffeeScript does not have multilingual support. |
|
17 |
TypeScript is compatible with any versions of JS. | Since CoffeeScript is not the direct updated version of JS, compatibility with JS is not possible. |
|
18 |
Object-oriented, functional and imperative programming is supported in TypeScript. | CoffeeScript supports only object-oriented programming. |
|
19 |
TypeScript supports repositories and version control systems. | CoffeeScript does not support any repository or version control system. |
|
20 |
A real-time server is a feature of TypeScript. | CoffeeScript does not have a real-time server. |
|
21 |
Partial classes are not supported in TypeScript. | Partial classes are supported in CoffeeScript. |
|
22 |
Mac operating system development is supported by TypeScript. | Mac operating system development is not supported by CoffeeScript. |
|
23 |
The performance of TypeScript is better. | The performance of CoffeeScript is not that great. |
|
24 |
A multi-user facility is not available in TypeScript. | A multi-user facility is available in TypeScript. |
|
25 |
Distractions are removed quietly in TypeScript. | This feature is not present in CoffeeScript. |
|
26 |
Code readability is not good in TypeScript. | Code readability is good in CoffeeScript. |
|
27 |
Runtime interpretation happens in TypeScript. | Runtime interpretation does not happen in CoffeeScript. |
|
28 |
The typeScript was created to make JS easy for Dotnet programmers. | CoffeeScript was created to make JS easy for Ruby and Python programmers. |
|
29 |
Windows application can be developed with TypeScript as it is developed by Microsoft. | Windows applications cannot be developed with CoffeeScript. |
|
30 |
TypeScript has duck typing. | CoffeeScript has an indent to scope style. |
|
31 |
TypeScript has a very good type of inference. | CoffeeScript’ type inference is not that great. |
|
32 |
TypeScript has good support for editors. | CoffeeScript does not have good support for editors. |
|
33 |
Angular code is worked well with TypeScript. | CoffeeScript does not support Angular code. |
|
34 |
Indentations are not present in TypeScript. Nested functions become complex and not easy for native users. | Indentations are present in CoffeeScript, and hence nested functions are easily readable. |
|
35 |
There are different methods to initialize and assign variables. | Variables are initialized and assigned through the same method in CoffeeScript, which makes it difficult. |
|
36 |
Documentation is not as easy as CoffeeScript. | Documentation is easy when compared with TypeScript. |
|
37 |
There is no option to find whether the function throws errors. | When a function throws an error, it is clearly shown. |
|
38 |
Libraries are present in TypeScript. | CoffeeScript has less number of libraries. |
Conclusion
Since CoffeeScript is not the direct version of JS, it is almost dead now. TypeScript up scales JS with the newer languages, and hence it is going to stay longer in the market. It is good to learn TypeScript now after getting a clear idea of JS. It is an easy tool to use once you know the basics.
Recommended Articles
This has been a guide to TypeScript vs CoffeeScript. Here we discuss the TypeScript vs CoffeeScript key differences with infographics and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
