Difference Between Mobx vs Redux
Mobx generally consists of state, derivations, reactions, and actions. In a state, like arrays, references, objects are considered as the data cells of the application. Derivations are considered as the value that can be processed automatically by the application state like formulas and charts in an application. Reactions mainly take care of input-output operations and updating DOM, and network requests need to be handled on time automatically. Actions modify the state and Mobx make sure that all the changes need to be processed synchronously.
Mobx can run on any ES5 environment. It supports node.js, rhino and all the browsers except IE8. It supports react native also. The one thing that needs to take care of is that Mobx is not a framework as it does not know how to structure your code, how to process and store the data. Mobx can be applied to any modern JS environment.
Redux is also referred to as intuitive state container. Redux helps to develop the applications that behave consistently in all the environments. It also helps developers to develop, test and debug the code easily. It can be used with React and another library view as well. Redux is very simple if you know flux or you have developed something on flux.
Redux is mainly used where the reasonable amount of data gets changed over the time. If the data is not changing frequently then Redux usage is less. It is used as a pattern for managing application state. There are some libraries or front-end technologies like React having their own application state management, so while using these libraries one should learn it’s inbuilt capabilities. Sometimes after developing the application, it becomes complex to understand and code, it is hard to know how the state has been changed. In this scenario, Redux is helpful and used.
Head To Head Comparison Between Mobx vs Redux (Infographics)
Below is the top 8 difference between Mobx vs Redux
Key differences between Mobx vs Redux
Both Mobx vs Redux are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major Difference Between Mobx vs Redux:
- In Mobx, the de-normalized data can be kept. In Redux, mainly the kept data is normalized data only.
- In Mobx, the updates can be done automatically with help of observable attribute. In Redux, the updates need to monitor manually.
- In Mobx, the states can be overwritten which also referred to as an impure state because the state can be updated simply with the new values. In Redux, the state is referred to as pure state as states are read-only and cannot be overwritten simply. It means it uses the immutable state.
- In Mobx, the debugging is difficult to do as tools available for Mobx is not up to the mark and which results in unpredictable responses many times. For Redux, there are a lot of developer tools available, pure functions and less abstraction makes debugging easier. The response is also predictable with the use of flux paradigm.
- In Mobx, a lot of built-in abstraction is there which leads to less code. In Redux, there is less abstraction and need to write more code.
- Mobx is mainly used to develop the application fast and in less time. Redux developed applications generally take time because of its complexity.
- Mobx is less maintainable. Redux is more maintainable.
- Mobx has less online community and developer support as compared to Redux. Redux has way ahead developer and online community support than Mobx.
Mobx vs Redux Comparison Table
The primary Comparison between Mobx vs Redux are discussed below:
|The basis of comparison Between Mobx vs Redux||
|Definition||It is testing library to make simple state management with help of TFRP.||It is Ja ava script library for managing the application state.|
|Developed||It is developed by Michel Weststrate||It is developed by Dan Abramov and Andrew Clark.|
|Data store||In Mobx, there is more than one store for data storage.||In Redux, there is only one large store for data storage.|
|Application||Mobx is mainly used for small and simple applications||Redux is mainly used for complex and large applications.|
|Scalable||Mobx is less scalable comparatively.||Redux is mainly used for scalable applications|
|Performance||Mobx gives good performance||Redux is not much efficient.|
Conclusion – Mobx vs Redux
Redux vs Mobx both are the libraries which are used to manage the application state in one way or the other. These both Redux vs Mobx are mainly combined with front-end libraries like react and angular to develop the user interfaces more interactive and to show the changing the data over the time.
Mobx is mainly preferred to use for the beginners as it is simple and easy to learn. Redux can be preferred for those who have a strong understanding of functional programming skills. It has been seen that Redux is well established and popular among the developers whereas Mobx is not that popular, but Mobx can be the good alternative for managing the state of the application.
Mobx vs Redux both are great libraries to work on and these can be selected depending on the requirements and availability of resources. Happy learning!!
This has a been a guide to the top differences between Mobx vs Redux. Here we also discuss the Mobx vs Redux key differences with infographics, and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles –
- Redux vs Flux
- Drupal vs Joomla
- Hadoop vs Spark
- Bootstrap vs Jquery
- Bootstrap vs jQuery UI: Features
- Best Functions of Bootstrap 4 Cheat sheet