AutoCAD vs Inventor

Difference between Autocad vs Inventor

AutoCAD is a heavyweight design production platform with post-development features. Developed and marketed by Autodesk, AutoCAD was initially released in 1982 as a desktop app running on microcomputers with internal graphics controllers. The latest version of AutoCAD was released as AutoCAD 360 that supports mobile and web also. Used by a wide range of industries, by project managers, engineers, architects, town planners, and many other professionals. The beauty of Inventor is that it allows the user to blend the 2D and 3D data into a single environment, that creates a virtual presentation of the output product that helps the user to validate the form, fit and function of the product before it is ever built. An inventor is developed on a dimension-driven design. Drawing any shape or object is simpler using the inventor.

Head To Head Comparison Between Autocad vs Inventor (Infographics)

Below are the top 6 differences between Autocad vs Inventor

Key differences between Autocad vs Inventor

Both Autocad vs Inventor are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major Differences Between Autocad vs Inventor:

AutoCAD is difficult to use and adapt due to the generic domain while Inventor is easy to use due to industry specificity.
AutoCAD works based on designing and discovering new items while Inventor targets users who want to test something in motion. For example, AutoCAD is used to design the robotic machine while Inventor can be used to imitate how that machine would move when used.
Since AutoCAD is used for designing and drafting, it is more used than Inventor as it ensures the right materials used before any tests.
If the user needs to work with a technical aspect of a program or device, then using Inventor would be perfect than using AutoCAD.
Inventor incorporated 3D modeling features by default, while AutoCAD lacks in these since it was primarily a 2D software and later it adapted 3D modules.
An inventor is visually and technically user-friendly software, as compared to AutoCAD.
AutoCAD is not a very smart program in comparison to Inventor. The user must draw lines all over again if anything he wants to change or move in the drawing later.
An inventor can distinguish between assemblies, parts and 2D drawing, unlike AutoCAD.
The inventor can update the existing geometry based on the updates within the base part of the geometry. While this base -part proportionality is not available in AutoCAD.
AutoCAD is a gigantic design production application with features like cross sectioning, artificial lighting based-renders and panoramic rendering for virtual walkthroughs. While the Inventor is, an application used after the designs are manufactured.
As the user creates 3D parts like chamfer, hole, fillet all are stored as independent features in Inventor. While in AutoCAD, the user finds it difficult and they must delete and re-create the specific feature.
The inventor was created for primarily the Manufacturing company. While AutoCAD was made for a larger audience. It was designed for Civil, Plant Design, FM, AEC and more.
An inventor does not use layers. That means, it sets up all the parameters once and then automatically assigns them to the parts from that point. While it is a troublesome task to use layers in AutoCAD.
Inventor allows the user to use any specific file formats or individual parts and assemblies. It has an amazing geometry-based engine designed to ensure that all readouts and analysis reports are generated in real time.
Since AutoCAD came a much before, people are more drifted towards AutoCAD. Inventor, on the other hand, was introduced much later.
An inventor is much more like a practical demo giving software where the user gets to know how his designs are working in motion. While AutoCAD is more for creating new models out of imagination.
Inventor being the latest amongst the two has the shortest learning curve, gives speedy results, has a very attractive workflow and interface, while AutoCAD is no less than it, but still, it lacks in some features.