Updated April 14, 2023
Difference Between Rollup vs Webpack
Head to Head Comparison Between Rollup vs Webpack (Infographics)
Below are the top 14 Comparisons between Rollup and Webpack:
Key differences of Rollup vs Webpack
Let us study some important key differences between Rollup and Webpack:
Both the Webpack and Rollup are categorized into JS Task runners or JS build tools. The major differences between Webpack and Rollup such as configuration, code splitting, transformation, development server, advantages, and limitations are discussed below.
Features of module bundlers
Configuration of module bundlers
Webpack offers a plugin known as webpack-dev-server that functions the testing and development of software applications, websites, programming. It offers a run-time environment in both software and hardware utilities which is a mandate to program the development and debugging. The simple development server of a webpack offers the functionality of a live reload. It requires a plugin and few configurations with a specific file format to serve and execute the script to execute on webpack-dev-server using package.json. But in a rollup, the implementation of the development server is made by rollup-plugin-serve that needs to rebuild the code whenever any change is required to offer the functionality on live reload but have to install an additional plugin rollup-plugin-live reload. But the configuration of the plugin should be mandatory.
Splitting of codes
Comparison table of Rollup vs Webpack
Below is the comparison table:
|Advantages||It involves code inclusion and elimination of dead code in the process of tree shaking. It can be renamed to the module in the main entry in package.json for es2015 import. It has simple API and scope hoisting.||It provides extensive support for image loading, CSS, HTML, and code splitting. It has rapid fast builds for substitution for hot modules.|
|Limitation||It has restricted code support and alternative loading of file types and has no splitting of codes.||It has no scope hosting, tree shaking and has a complicated API|
|Input type of multiple modules||The input type is CJS, ES +||Here it has ES, +|
|The output type of multiple modules||It has global UMD, AMD, and CJS||It has global, ES, UMD, AMD, and CJS|
|Flexibility||It has many extensible features and has simple configurations that attract global users.||It is flexible because of its simple configuration and plugin.|
|Integration||It can be integrated with Devsync and Recompose||Gatsby, Buddy, Gridsome are few integrated tools.|
Rollup makes it simple for package publications and has an easier configuration. It has better tree shaking and offers only a minimum size of bundles. Whereas Webpack is a strong bundler and manages all kinds of assets. It has a simple configuration and has a Laravel-mixture. But it is underdeveloped and over-engineered. But the configuration of Webpack is a little difficult.
This is a guide to Rollup vs Webpack. Here we discuss the difference between Rollup vs Webpack, key differences, and comparison table. You can also go through our other related articles to learn more –